W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: ISSUE-36: Summary of ways of making containers

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:17:27 +0100
Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <AD403420-D3B4-4745-9AA7-8D2DE4D6B40B@bblfish.net>
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>

On 24 Jan 2013, at 20:04, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
> 
> > ... 
> > One could make the append rule more subtle for what I have 
> > called ldp:Content objects that I have talked  about today:
> > 
> >  A POST of a graph containing the triple:
> > 
> >   <> a ldp:Container 
> > 
> > would create a new container resource. That seems 
> > quite plausible....
> 
> I have to admit not to understand why you want or need to introduce so many different classes. I'm no expert in defining ontologies so maybe it's just my lack of knowledge here but for what it's worth I don't see anything in the LDP spec as it stands which prevents this behavior. It's just silent about it.

Which class am I ontroducing here? ldp:Container is part of the spec, and that's the only one mentioned 
in the text you quoted above.

> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/




Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 19:18:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:44 UTC