Re: Aggregation: simple proposal

Nandana , until Henry announces that the wiki page reflects his current 
thinking accurately here on the list, it's perhaps premature to start 
refining it via Q&A. 
I did finish standing up basic pages that incorporate all the email 
threads I was aware of yesterday, *but* the relevant owners were only made 
aware that the pages are ready for them to sand and polish within the last 
24 hours or so.  In both cases, I hooked everything up and asked the 
authors to have a first look before "announcing" their existence to the 
group.  E.g. on both pages there are pieces of content where I was unsure 
of their intent so they were left open with the proposal owner's name to 
flag the need for attention.
In Roger's case, it's unlikely he'll be able to do even a first pass until 
Thursday.
I'm not even going to attempt to populate the comparison section until we 
have the proposal pages themselves refined to the point where their owners 
feel they are open for business.  I'm also planning to pick up the spec 
example and see if that has any bearing, since one of the discussions 
around the existing proposals included a remark that the spec example was 
unclear on some points.  I think that original example probably assumed an 
aggregation model (given the authors), so it might form a de facto third 
proposal of sorts that I need to evolve.  That's not going to happen 
today, however.  I'm not sure if I'll even get to the assessment this 
week.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario