Re: containers examples should end in /

On 14/01/13 17:39, Henry Story wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2013, at 18:25, "Wilde, Erik"<Erik.Wilde@emc.com>  wrote:
>
>> >hello all.
>> >
>> >On 2013-01-14 14:54 , "Henry Story"<henry.story@bblfish.net>  wrote:
>>> >>The argument is that instead of having containers
>>> >>with URLs such as
>>> >>http://example.org/container1
>>> >>they should be
>>> >>http://example.org/container1/
>> >
>> >picking one over the other is a preference of the entity managing
>> >container URIs and should be of no concern for the protocol (i.e., LDP
>> >implementations should have the freedom to go one way or the other).
> I did not argued for a MUST on containers ending in "/".
> I was putting forward an argument for what types of URIs would be
> better to be used by the examples in the spec.
>

I don't believe that the examples should be depending on particular 
choices of appearance or naming style.

	Andy

Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 09:11:06 UTC