Re: Draft OGC JSON Best Practice

Hi all,

I don'r remember the WG discussing this nor making an official feedback to
the Open Geospatial group...
Either I missed something, or this topic went to the limbo, being not
registered as a github issue?

  best

On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 01:22, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:

> On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:09 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin <
> pierre-antoine.champin@univ-lyon1.fr> wrote:
>
> I had a look at this section in particular.
>
> * "[The JSON-LD documentation] is difficult to understand from the point
> of view of a JSON and XML user"
>
>   ouch!
>
>
> Well, this is why we need a Primer! Still, perhaps some specific feedback
> from them on how the spec could be improved to make it more understandable.
>
> * "a class name (a.k.a. data type)"
>
>   This bothers me for 2 reasons:
>   - calling them "data types" may create confusion with literal datatypes;
>   - what is being given a type is not the data,
>     it is the *real-world object* described by the data.
>
>   In both cases, I'm not entirely sure whether it requires fixing,
>   or it is just purist nitpicking…
>
>
> +1 We could give them some feedback on this, so as not to further confuse
> the issue.
>
> * "lists of lists are not allowed in JSON-LD"
>
>   This is true of JSON-LD 1.0, but was fixed in JSON-LD 1.1.
>   Should be suggest that they say "JSON-LD 1.0",  and possibly mention the
> fix in "JSON-LD 1.1"?
>   Or even possibly suggest that the move to JSON-LD 1.1, even if they
> publish before us,
>   just like VC and WoT are about to do?
>
>
> +1 They might do exactly what VC is going to do.
>
> Gregg
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:29, ajs6f <ajs6f@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> The JSON-LD-specific section of this rather large document seems to be at:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/blob/master/json-best-practice/clause_7-from_json_to_jsonld.adoc
>>
>> ajs6f
>>
>> > On Apr 10, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I forwarded this request on before; it should be discussed on the next
>> call.
>> >
>> > Gregg Kellogg
>> > gregg@greggkellogg.net
>> >
>> >> Begin forwarded message:
>> >>
>> >> From: Gobe Hobona <ghobona@opengeospatial.org>
>> >> Subject: Draft OGC JSON Best Practice
>> >> Date: March 7, 2019 at 12:14:38 AM PST
>> >> To: gregg@greggkellogg.net
>> >> Cc: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Joan Masó Pau <
>> joan.maso@uab.cat>
>> >>
>> >> Dear Gregg,
>> >>
>> >> The Architecture Domain Working Group of the the Open Geospatial
>> Consortium (OGC) has been working on a JSON Best Practice for the
>> geospatial community. The document is still in draft form but we would
>> appreciate it if you could please share the link with the W3C JSON-LD
>> community group. Any feedback is welcome.
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/tree/master/json-best-practice
>> >>
>> >> I have copied in Joan Maso, the chair of the Architecture Domain
>> Working Group and editor of the draft OGC JSON Best Practice.
>> >>
>> >> I have also copied in Linda van den Brink (Geonovum), the chair of the
>> OGC-W3C Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group
>> https://www.w3.org/2017/sdwig/
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Gobe
>> >>
>> >> __________________________________________
>> >>
>> >> Dr. Gobe Hobona, PhD MRICS
>> >> Director, Knowledge Management
>> >> Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
>> >> OGC: Making location count.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/gobehobona
>> >> Tel: +44 744 409 6781
>> >> e-mail: ghobona@opengeospatial.org
>> >> www.opengeospatial.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>