- From: ajs6f <ajs6f@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:28:00 -0400
- To: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
I've tagged it as an issue, just to have something to remember it by. https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-wg/issues/82 Adam Soroka > On May 10, 2019, at 8:11 PM, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@univ-lyon1.fr> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I don'r remember the WG discussing this nor making an official feedback to the Open Geospatial group... > Either I missed something, or this topic went to the limbo, being not registered as a github issue? > > best > > On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 01:22, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >> On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:09 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@univ-lyon1.fr> wrote: >> >> I had a look at this section in particular. >> >> * "[The JSON-LD documentation] is difficult to understand from the point of view of a JSON and XML user" >> >> ouch! > > Well, this is why we need a Primer! Still, perhaps some specific feedback from them on how the spec could be improved to make it more understandable. > >> * "a class name (a.k.a. data type)" >> >> This bothers me for 2 reasons: >> - calling them "data types" may create confusion with literal datatypes; >> - what is being given a type is not the data, >> it is the *real-world object* described by the data. >> >> In both cases, I'm not entirely sure whether it requires fixing, >> or it is just purist nitpicking… > > +1 We could give them some feedback on this, so as not to further confuse the issue. > >> * "lists of lists are not allowed in JSON-LD" >> >> This is true of JSON-LD 1.0, but was fixed in JSON-LD 1.1. >> Should be suggest that they say "JSON-LD 1.0", and possibly mention the fix in "JSON-LD 1.1"? >> Or even possibly suggest that the move to JSON-LD 1.1, even if they publish before us, >> just like VC and WoT are about to do? > > +1 They might do exactly what VC is going to do. > > Gregg > >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:29, ajs6f <ajs6f@apache.org> wrote: >> The JSON-LD-specific section of this rather large document seems to be at: >> >> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/blob/master/json-best-practice/clause_7-from_json_to_jsonld.adoc >> >> ajs6f >> >> > On Apr 10, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >> > >> > I forwarded this request on before; it should be discussed on the next call. >> > >> > Gregg Kellogg >> > gregg@greggkellogg.net >> > >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> >> >> From: Gobe Hobona <ghobona@opengeospatial.org> >> >> Subject: Draft OGC JSON Best Practice >> >> Date: March 7, 2019 at 12:14:38 AM PST >> >> To: gregg@greggkellogg.net >> >> Cc: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Joan Masó Pau <joan.maso@uab.cat> >> >> >> >> Dear Gregg, >> >> >> >> The Architecture Domain Working Group of the the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) has been working on a JSON Best Practice for the geospatial community. The document is still in draft form but we would appreciate it if you could please share the link with the W3C JSON-LD community group. Any feedback is welcome. >> >> >> >> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/tree/master/json-best-practice >> >> >> >> I have copied in Joan Maso, the chair of the Architecture Domain Working Group and editor of the draft OGC JSON Best Practice. >> >> >> >> I have also copied in Linda van den Brink (Geonovum), the chair of the OGC-W3C Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group https://www.w3.org/2017/sdwig/ >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Gobe >> >> >> >> __________________________________________ >> >> >> >> Dr. Gobe Hobona, PhD MRICS >> >> Director, Knowledge Management >> >> Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) >> >> OGC: Making location count. >> >> >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/gobehobona >> >> Tel: +44 744 409 6781 >> >> e-mail: ghobona@opengeospatial.org >> >> www.opengeospatial.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >
Received on Monday, 13 May 2019 15:28:27 UTC