W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > July 2012

RE: Query parts in IRIs in plain text mail

From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:34:52 +0000
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B6AF630@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Outlook 2010 + IE10:
shows in the address bar (which will show IRIs).   I suspect that means UTF-8, but a
better test would be one that actually has 2 pages of content at the two different URIs
where the content tells you which one it was (so the display of the address won't 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Martin J. Dürst" [mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 3:47 AM
> To: public-iri@w3.org
> Subject: Query parts in IRIs in plain text mail
> This is a test based on the comment by Dave Thaler that IRIs may also appear
> in (plain text) email.
> If my MUA (Eudora/Penelope/Thunderbird) does what I told it, this mail
> should be in iso-8859-1 (Latin-1). If you have any way to check that it's still
> Latin-1 at your end, please do so.
> The IRI to test,
>     http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/non-existent?résumé
> is the same as the one I used in the SVG test.
> It won't resolve (and doesn't need to), but should show you where your
> browser wants to go
> (http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/non-existent?r%C3%A9sum%C3%A9 if it
> uses
> UTF-8 for the IRI->URI conversion,
> http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/non-existent?r%E9sum%E9 if it uses iso-
> 8859-1).
> Please report any results on the list.
> Regards,   Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 16:35:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:44 UTC