W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > July 2011

Re: I-D Action: draft-reschke-ref-parsing-00.txt

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:30:27 +0200
To: public-iri@w3.org
Message-ID: <4pe017hsaq1jkaclt4r8hiv16qd4thbuvc@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-ref-parsing-00.txt

I think it is unnecessary and confusing to have this "Candidate" layer
of indirection (I don't see what trouble people have with the regular
expression to begin with, so I feel similar about the document as a
whole). It's not meaningful for instance to say some string has scheme,
authority, path, but only a candidate query; that's just weird.

In section 3.2 you have "The result will be a valid URI Reference if
and only if the components used by the algorithm were valid themselves."
I have some doubts about "only if", consider for instance removing dot
segments, which might remove a malformed part, if I recall correctly.

As for B.3., I would think the only people who might find that a vaguely
good idea are people who have trouble applying regular expressions, and
I see no reason to accomodate them with normative documents (I assume it
is meant for normative reference and not just illustration).
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 3 July 2011 10:30:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:52:01 GMT