W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > October 2010

registration templates, Re: [Uri-review] Updated 'javascript' scheme draft

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:40:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4CAB1CC1.6060603@gmx.de>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, IRI WG mailing list <public-iri@w3.org>
On 05.10.2010 06:17, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> ...
> My draft does not include the registration template. That has a lead to
> some complaints, but my reading of RFC 4395 is that it is not required,
> and http://www.w3.org/mid/455CCAAD.2040407@att.com Tony Hansen confirmed
> that. The template is not currently used outside the specification when
> it is part of an RFC, and in my case it would just be a TOC for the do-
> cument; I think it should be clarified that it is not needed in this
> case.
> ...

Disagreeing :-)

A registration template is very useful, because:

- it forces the author to think about all the required fields, and

- it makes it easy for reviewers to actually find the relevant sections 
in the spec.

Thus I'd like the template to become mandatory.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 13:41:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:52:00 GMT