Re: "Web Address processing" (ABNF, processing proposal)

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ...
> Even setting aside the fact that it's needed in multiple places, I think 
> it would be hugely preferable for all of the required processing to be 
> defined in a single spec, rather than spread across multiple. If HTML5 
> defines some preprocessing rules after which IRIbis applies, then that 
> is considerably harder for implementors to follow and creates more 
> opportunity for error.
> ...

It appears to me that, in order to get interop for "weird" IRIs, it's 
not really relevant where things are defined, but that we have a good 
set of test cases.

Best regards, Julian