There is at least one relevant list: public-iri@w3.org. I believe that's where discussion of updating the base URI specs is moving? I'm trying to join myself. Lisa On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Theo Zourzouvillys <theo@crazygreek.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > sip URI's (along with a bunch of others, such as iax, im, pres, and > xmpp) allow embedded IPv6 literals in their URIs, but match > path-rootless in RFC 3986, which does not allow '[' and ']' - these > are only allowed in authority. This means that a generic URI parser > will treat an IPv6 SIP URI as invalid unless it is aware of SIP URIs. > > I documented it earlier in the month here: > > http://crazygreek.co.uk/b/2009/03/sip-uri-syntax-is-broken-with-ipv6.html > > I'd appreciate feedback on how to best proceed to get this fixed? > > Kind regards, > > ~ Theo > _______________________________________________ > Apps-Discuss mailing list > Apps-Discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss >Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 19:32:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:33:36 GMT