W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-w3c@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:02:28 +0200
Message-ID: <48A57E64.8000504@alvestrand.no>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, fd <fd@w3.org>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org

(randomly dropping by)

if you can get some review from the IAB too, that would be good.
Or perhaps Sally Floyd.

It's very relevant to RFC 3238, "IAB Architectural and Policy 
Considerations for Open Pluggable Edge Services", if I've understood it 
rightly.

Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> Neither is guaranteed to produce a result by a particular date; both 
> are volunteer efforts :)
>
> Why don't I try to get someone from HTTPbis signed up, and if that 
> doesn't work in a short amount of time, we can fall back to the review 
> group?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 13/08/2008, at 11:16 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Le mercredi 13 août 2008 à 23:08 +1000, Mark Nottingham a écrit :
>>> Sorry for the delay; I've been travelling, then sick (as a result of
>>> travelling).
>>>
>>> IETF WGs don't have any mechanism in place to formally review external
>>> documents; however, as Chair I can solicit individuals within the
>>> group to provide reviews, if that would help.
>>>
>>> Another alternative would be to ask the APPS Area review team 
>>> <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/apps-review/
>>>> if they could provide feedback.
>>>
>>> What would you prefer?
>>
>> I don't have a personal preference; which of these approaches is the
>> more likely to provide us feedback in the said timeframe? Are they
>> mutually exclusive? :)
>>
>> Thanks for your response,
>>
>> Dom
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 15 August 2008 13:03:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 August 2008 13:03:12 GMT