Neither is guaranteed to produce a result by a particular date; both are volunteer efforts :) Why don't I try to get someone from HTTPbis signed up, and if that doesn't work in a short amount of time, we can fall back to the review group? Cheers, On 13/08/2008, at 11:16 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Le mercredi 13 août 2008 à 23:08 +1000, Mark Nottingham a écrit : >> Sorry for the delay; I've been travelling, then sick (as a result of >> travelling). >> >> IETF WGs don't have any mechanism in place to formally review >> external >> documents; however, as Chair I can solicit individuals within the >> group to provide reviews, if that would help. >> >> Another alternative would be to ask the APPS Area review team <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/apps-review/ >>> if they could provide feedback. >> >> What would you prefer? > > I don't have a personal preference; which of these approaches is the > more likely to provide us feedback in the said timeframe? Are they > mutually exclusive? :) > > Thanks for your response, > > Dom > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2008 13:24:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 August 2008 13:24:02 GMT