- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:23:00 +1000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, fd <fd@w3.org>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
Neither is guaranteed to produce a result by a particular date; both are volunteer efforts :) Why don't I try to get someone from HTTPbis signed up, and if that doesn't work in a short amount of time, we can fall back to the review group? Cheers, On 13/08/2008, at 11:16 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Le mercredi 13 août 2008 à 23:08 +1000, Mark Nottingham a écrit : >> Sorry for the delay; I've been travelling, then sick (as a result of >> travelling). >> >> IETF WGs don't have any mechanism in place to formally review >> external >> documents; however, as Chair I can solicit individuals within the >> group to provide reviews, if that would help. >> >> Another alternative would be to ask the APPS Area review team <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/apps-review/ >>> if they could provide feedback. >> >> What would you prefer? > > I don't have a personal preference; which of these approaches is the > more likely to provide us feedback in the said timeframe? Are they > mutually exclusive? :) > > Thanks for your response, > > Dom > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2008 13:24:02 UTC