W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-w3c@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Review of Content Transformation Guidelines

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:23:00 +1000
Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, fd <fd@w3.org>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
Message-Id: <D65FF5FE-1881-482A-B9C9-5D1C6A5D5455@mnot.net>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>

Neither is guaranteed to produce a result by a particular date; both  
are volunteer efforts :)

Why don't I try to get someone from HTTPbis signed up, and if that  
doesn't work in a short amount of time, we can fall back to the review  


On 13/08/2008, at 11:16 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> Le mercredi 13 août 2008 à 23:08 +1000, Mark Nottingham a écrit :
>> Sorry for the delay; I've been travelling, then sick (as a result of
>> travelling).
>> IETF WGs don't have any mechanism in place to formally review  
>> external
>> documents; however, as Chair I can solicit individuals within the
>> group to provide reviews, if that would help.
>> Another alternative would be to ask the APPS Area review team <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/apps-review/
>>> if they could provide feedback.
>> What would you prefer?
> I don't have a personal preference; which of these approaches is the
> more likely to provide us feedback in the said timeframe? Are they
> mutually exclusive? :)
> Thanks for your response,
> Dom

Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2008 13:24:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:33 UTC