W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-ws@w3.org > May 2004

RE: sec 4.11

From: Addison Phillips [wM] <aphillips@webmethods.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:51:08 -0700
To: "Tex Texin" <tex@xencraft.com>, "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@jtcsv.com>
Cc: "Web Services" <public-i18n-ws@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PNEHIBAMBMLHDMJDDFLHIEFIIAAA.aphillips@webmethods.com>

This whole conversation is fascinating, piquant, rich, vibrant.... and way off topic from the material that should be going into our note about Web services. It would make a wonderful FAQ or series thereof for GEO. And it does point out some areas that maybe the I18N WG should consider for our new charter, chiefly: collation identifiers, now that the Newman draft seems to be stuck. We have previously agreed that USWD is not an internationalization primer. Let's demonstrate that collation problems exist for Web services and avoid unnecessary detail (Tex will note that I removed about half of his example material, not because I didn't agree with it, but rather because it went on too long).

We can reference LDML and CLDR where appropriate. But for now I'd prefer to see LESS detail.

My two cents.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Director, Globalization Architecture
webMethods | Delivering Global Business Visibility
http://www.webMethods.com
Chair, W3C Internationalization (I18N) Working Group
Chair, W3C-I18N-WG, Web Services Task Force
http://www.w3.org/International

Internationalization is an architecture. 
It is not a feature.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tex Texin [mailto:tex@xencraft.com]
> Sent: 2004年5月11日 20:26
> To: Mark Davis
> Cc: Addison Phillips [wM]; Web Services
> Subject: Re: sec 4.11
> 
> 
> Mark,
> 
> I thought about it when I was drafting the note and decided it 
> was too early in
> LDML's life. Be glad to learn otherwise.
> 
> This doc is just describing scenarios and highlighting potential
> internationalization concerns. It doesn't need to be 
> comprehensive with respect
> to all the details. Later on, I presume, we will write the how-to 
> guides and
> can point at LDML as a solution.
> 
> But that's just my initial cut at it. Maybe Addison or others will see it
> differently.
> 
> tex
> 
> Mark Davis wrote:
> > 
> > BTW, you might also reference LDML collation settings:
> >  http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#Setting_Options
> > 
> > Mark
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 13:07:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:53 GMT