Hi Felix, all, > - Links to ITS 1.0 spec: I think we should use either "this version" > or "latest version". Currently we use both. My preference would be > "this version" links. > - "Internationalization Best Practices: Handling Right-to-left Scripts > in XHTML and HTML Content": this is currently a WD, so using a > "latest version" link might be good since we want to direct people > to the to-be-published WG note (see the shortname i18n-html-tech-bidi). > - Link to xml lang and white space definition: I might be convinced > now that we can use a "latest version" link. > - For the other links, i.e. to Ruby, "Unicode in XML", XHTML 1, xml:id > and XML Schema, I would prefer a "this version" link. All sound fine (and for xml:lang I have no strong opinion either way). -ysReceived on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 07:46:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 January 2008 07:46:35 GMT