W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: BP comments

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:29:43 +0900
Message-ID: <4781E2F7.7050900@w3.org>
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
CC: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>, public-i18n-its@w3.org

Jirka Kosek wrote:
> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>>>> Section 5.3:
>>>> There are only links to schemas, but source listings of schemas are
>>>> not present. In other section we usually show schema listing.
>>>> Shouldn't we unify this?
>>> Yes, it would be good, if we have time.
>> the schemas are rather long. Are you sure you really want to show
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/xmlspec/xmlspec.dtd
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/xmlspec/xmlspec.rnc
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/xmlspec/xmlspec.xsd
>> in the BP document?
> [I suppose you meant files .../xmlspec-its.(dtd|rnc|xsd)]
ups, yes, sorry.
> They are really big and of course inappropriate for including into BP. I
> though they are just sort of driver files that include xmlspec and its
> schemas and do few redefinitions. I should look inside them before
> suggesting this nonsense. Sorry.
np. I could also change the definitions to be just driver files as in 
the DocBook example, but not sure if it is worth the effort.

Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 08:29:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:09 UTC