Re: BP comments

Jirka Kosek wrote:
> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
>   
>>>> Section 5.3:
>>>> There are only links to schemas, but source listings of schemas are
>>>> not present. In other section we usually show schema listing.
>>>> Shouldn't we unify this?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Yes, it would be good, if we have time.
>>>   
>>>       
>> the schemas are rather long. Are you sure you really want to show
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/xmlspec/xmlspec.dtd
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/xmlspec/xmlspec.rnc
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/xmlspec/xmlspec.xsd
>> in the BP document?
>>     
>
> [I suppose you meant files .../xmlspec-its.(dtd|rnc|xsd)]
>   
ups, yes, sorry.
> They are really big and of course inappropriate for including into BP. I
> though they are just sort of driver files that include xmlspec and its
> schemas and do few redefinitions. I should look inside them before
> suggesting this nonsense. Sorry.
>   
np. I could also change the definitions to be just driver files as in 
the DocBook example, but not sure if it is worth the effort.

Felix