W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > October to December 2007

RE: Assigning ids

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 05:36:02 -0700
To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005301c83672$3b57ca80$0e32a8c0@BREIZH>

Hi Christrian, Richard, all 

>> ...
>> I guess one consideration is related to inlines/elements within 
>> text/placeables (see above): message-like expressions with 
>> placeholders are very likely to undergo a kind reordering (cf.
>> "There are <x> file(s) on <x>.") during translation.
>
> I think this is something we ought to discuss a little.
> 
> My inclination is to say that anything that counts for 
> segmentation (see BP6) should have an id. This will include 
> embedded quotations etc.  
> Also, variables and embedded text in composite messages 
> should have ids, as Christian says.
> I don't think inline/phrasal elements like <em> need ids, 
> if used properly.

I would tend to agree with this. 

The only use for IDs in phrasal elements like <emph> I can think of would be for extraction/merge purpose. But one could just
generate the IDs at extraction time if needed.

I'm not even sure a quote would qualify. Placeholders for variables do for sure.


just my 2 cents
-yves
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 12:36:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:50 GMT