RE: Test suite general design and Namespace URIs

> I would propose (or I proposed before) that you, Sebastian 
> and me only enter <resultFile> elements if the result files 
> exist. In that way we can make a more fine grained comparision 
> of results than "all or nothing", and we also know what is missing. 

OK. I'll change the input-file-list.xml to reflect that.
-ys


-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:26 AM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: RE: Test suite general design and Namespace URIs

Hi Yves,

2006-12-22 (金) の 10:10 -0700 に Yves Savourel さんは書きました:
> Hi Felix, all,
> 
> Thanks for updating the namespaces.
> 
> I've edited the test suite file to add the links to the XSLT transform 
> as well as the links to the results files for Sebastian (soon to be 
> there :)
> 
> I've also updated the tests/input-file-list.xml file with the entries 
> for implementation #1, #2, and #3. Since some of the files are not 
> there yet we get errors in the XSLT check result file,


you can avoid that by having no <resultFile> element inside the <inputFile> element (see the declaration <!ELEMENT inputFile
(resultFile*)>) . 

I would propose (or I proposed before) that you, Sebastian and me only enter <resultFile> elements if the result files exist. In that way we can make a more fine grained comparision of results than "all or nothing", and we also know what is missing.

> but that'll be resolved as we post the implementation results files (and the expected result files in the case of Ruby, Directionality and language information).
> 
> Cheers,
> And happy holidays

You too :)

Felix

> -yves
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 8:22 AM
> To: Yves Savourel
> Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Test suite general design and Namespace URIs
> 
> 2006-12-22 (金) の 07:26 -0700 に Yves Savourel さんは書きました:
> > >>  but I was wondering
> > >> if we should not be more specific and indicate that it's the 
> > >> 'test/validation' output format we are talking about, not some 
> > >> kind
> > of
> > >> 'standard' ITS output expected from all ITS processors. Maybe 
> > >> others have opinions?
> > >
> > > fine by me. So how about
> > > http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/testoutputformat ?
> > 
> > Fine by me.
> > -yves
> 
> OK, I updated all files below /International/its/tests with the new namespace . I used for the compare.xsl script http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/outputcompare .
> 
> Felix
> 
>