W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > October to December 2006

RE: Test suite general design and Namespace URIs

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:19:19 +0900
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <1166797159.5118.18.camel@fsasaki-desktop>

Hi Yves,

2006-12-22 (金) の 06:35 -0700 に Yves Savourel さんは書きました:
> Hi Felix,
> 
> > I have updated the implementation report at
> > http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/ImpReport 
> > with a description of the output format, including the 
> > namespace URI http://www.w3.org/2005/its/outputformat.
> > Please have a look.
> 
> I have three minors notes:
> 
> 1- In section 2.1, bullet 2, we have "The Okapi Framework open-source
> project has implemented three ITS data categories: Translate,
> Localization Note, Terminology and Elements Within Text."
> That should be *four* not *three*.

Thanks, fixed.

> 
> 2- In section 2.2 we have "The format uses the namespace
> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/outputformat and not the namespace for ITS
> markup http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its."
> I would drop "and not the namespace for ITS markup
> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its." It seems superfluous to me. Why would we
> list the namespaces we don't use? (But I don't feel strongly about it if
> you want to keep that).

ok, dropped.

> 
> 3- I'm fine with http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/outputformat if it's OK
> to use it (and it seems you have checked already),

yes, it's ok.

>  but I was wondering
> if we should not be more specific and indicate that it's the
> 'test/validation' output format we are talking about, not some kind of
> 'standard' ITS output expected from all ITS processors. Maybe others
> have opinions?

fine by me. So how about
http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/testoutputformat ?

Felix
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 14:19:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:48 GMT