W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > October to December 2006

RE: Test suite general design and Namespace URIs

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:35:46 -0700
Message-ID: <742F71D71E424346A47CA8BE9B70DCB00D172B@lupus.RWS.LOCAL>
To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>

Hi Felix,

> I have updated the implementation report at
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/ImpReport 
> with a description of the output format, including the 
> namespace URI http://www.w3.org/2005/its/outputformat.
> Please have a look.

I have three minors notes:

1- In section 2.1, bullet 2, we have "The Okapi Framework open-source
project has implemented three ITS data categories: Translate,
Localization Note, Terminology and Elements Within Text."
That should be *four* not *three*.

2- In section 2.2 we have "The format uses the namespace
http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/outputformat and not the namespace for ITS
markup http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its."
I would drop "and not the namespace for ITS markup
http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its." It seems superfluous to me. Why would we
list the namespaces we don't use? (But I don't feel strongly about it if
you want to keep that).

3- I'm fine with http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/outputformat if it's OK
to use it (and it seems you have checked already), but I was wondering
if we should not be more specific and indicate that it's the
'test/validation' output format we are talking about, not some kind of
'standard' ITS output expected from all ITS processors. Maybe others
have opinions?

Cheers,
-yves
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 13:35:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:48 GMT