I agree, too. I also think that by using modes, one can avoid the restrictions of patters. Regards, Martin. At 22:01 06/12/07, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 05:55 -0700, Yves Savourel wrote: >> I agree. > >+1. > >Felix > >> -ys >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz >> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:16 AM >> To: Felix Sasaki >> Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org >> Subject: Re: What is possible in XSLT patterns >> >> >> I incline to the view that we should recommend using the simpler subset >of XPath, but not mandate it; and leave it to XSLT-based >> implementations to trap the situation and if necessary fail if they >detect patterns they cannot process. But also that we should >> stick to the subset of patterns in our test data and examples. >> >> Sebastian >> >> #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jpReceived on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 05:14:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:48 GMT