- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:01:27 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Cc: 'Sebastian Rahtz' <sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>, public-i18n-its@w3.org
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 05:55 -0700, Yves Savourel wrote: > I agree. +1. Felix > -ys > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:16 AM > To: Felix Sasaki > Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org > Subject: Re: What is possible in XSLT patterns > > > I incline to the view that we should recommend using the simpler subset of XPath, but not mandate it; and leave it to XSLT-based > implementations to trap the situation and if necessary fail if they detect patterns they cannot process. But also that we should > stick to the subset of patterns in our test data and examples. > > Sebastian > >
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 13:01:38 UTC