http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3000 ------- Comment #12 from christian.lieske@sap.com 2006-03-27 09:06 ------- >From my understanding, we needed provisions for allowing non-ITS namespace markup in the non-normative schemas. We seem to have/get this once Sebastian has passed some ODD-related info to Felix. What remains to be done wrt. the extensibility issue is the following: 0. advice people against working with extensions for which ITS capabilities exist; example: If your vocabulary captures translatability information with an attribute "myVoc:TranslateMe='y'" than use the ITS mapping/passthrough capabilities rather than working with an extension "myVoc:Translate='y'" 1. make sure that the spec. mentions that ITS does not provide ITS-specific extensibility (and rather relies on standard XML-namespace based mechanisms) 2. mention that the non-normative schemas are designed for use with standard (that is XML-namespace based) mechanism Best regards, ChristianReceived on Monday, 27 March 2006 09:07:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:46 GMT