Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > > > Felix Sasaki wrote: > > >>> In other words: the selector points to one or more nodes, we apply >>> the ITS property there. If there are already ITS properties >>> applied in some children of these nodes are they overriden or not? >>> > > that depends on the order of the rules. if > //y > comes after > //x//y > then the second rule wins > >> I would say you don't need to do an override: In my XQuery >> implementation, XPath expressions like "//text[@localize='no']" are >> interpreted as "//text[@localize='no']/descendant-or-self::*". How >> about you, Sebastian? > > I don't think I agree. My view is that only "translate" is inherited, > not "localize". I think the selector should be "//text//*" for localize, > if that is really want is meant. > > Or do we expect "localize" to be inherited? I have no preference, we should just decide on s.t. , and make it clear in the draft. - FelixReceived on Monday, 13 March 2006 15:20:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC