W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: [Bug 2969] Terminology

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:06:45 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20060303110327.05d53ec0@localhost>
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Cc: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>

Please note that there are lots of other terminology standards.
Just coordinating with one may not be good enough. On the other
hand, trying to do everything will take a lot of time.

Felix, I suggest you talk with Olivier, he has looked at quite
some of these standards and can point you to others on the W3C
team who have.

There is also a public mailing list archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-glossary/
that contains some pointers.

Regards,    Martin.

At 06:43 06/03/03, bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org wrote:
 >
 >http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2969
 >
 >           Summary: Terminology
 >           Product: ITS
 >           Version: WorkingDraft
 >          Platform: PC
 >        OS/Version: Windows XP
 >            Status: NEW
 >          Keywords: needsAgreement
 >          Severity: normal
 >          Priority: P2
 >         Component: ITS tagset
 >        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
 >        ReportedBy: azydron@xml-intl.com
 >         QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org
 >
 >
 >We need to synchronize efforts with the OSCAR TBX/Link draft specification to
 >make sure that we do not duplicate or produce conflicting standards. A unified
 >approach will bring benefit for both efforts. 
Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 05:26:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC