W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2915] Clarify relationship between host vocabulary markup data cats and ITS data cats

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:49:38 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1FBwFG-0000Q5-6K@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2915

           Summary: Clarify relationship between host vocabulary markup data
                    cats and ITS data cats
           Product: ITS
           Version: LastCall
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ITS tagset
        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
        ReportedBy: christian.lieske@sap.com
         QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org


(see also bug 2877 (terminology data category))

1. What if the host vocabulary already has markup related to terms (see for 
example DITA and DocBook)? Do we recommend keeping it and mapping it via a 
documentRule? If so: Can this recommendation be generalized, and thus for 
example become part of the introduction to data categories?

2. What if the host vocabulary and our ITS markup related to terms only share 
some commonalities? Example: The DITA "term" element allows more than just one 
attribute with additional information? Do we suggest to

a. move stuff from ITS into host vocabulary
   
  <dita:term its:dir="ltr">PlateBroiler</dita:term>

b. move stuff from host vocabulary into ITS

  <its:term dita:platform="CoolOS">PlateBroiler</its:term>

Or do we suggest something completely different?

3. What if we have a clash of the information from the namespace of the host 
vocabulary and the ITS namespace? Example

<head>
  <documentRule its:term="yes" its:termSelector="//dita:term">
</head>
<body>
  <p>The highly visible <dita:term dita:translate="no">PlateBroiler</term> ...
</body>

4. What if the host vocabulary and ITS differ with regard to one of the 
following:

4.1 content model (for example PCDATA vs. mixed)
4.2 data type (for example NMTOKEN vs. CDATA)
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 15:49:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC