W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Action item: summary of scope requirement

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:47:59 +0900
To: "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@translate.com>, public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.sywa99umx1753t@ibm-60d333fc0ec>

Hello Yves,

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:40:40 +0900, Yves Savourel  
<ysavourel@translate.com> wrote:

>
> Hello all,
>
>> From what I can see, Felix has done a great job wrt.
>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0509SpecScoping#preview.
>> Thanks for this Felix.
>
> Indeed.
>
> The only notes I have are for the different data categories used. I  
> assume some are just placeholders and need to be defined
> further.

Yes, that was my intention, sorry for being unclear.

>
> I understand these three:
>
> translateScope
> dirScope
> rubyScope
> termScope
>
> But I'm not sure what to think about these:
>
> locinfoScope
> lingInfoScope
>
> locinfo would be things like constraints? Or notes to localizer?

Notes to localizers.

>
> I've noticed that most our examples show ways of solving complicated  
> situations. We probably need also a few samples on how to use
> the system with basic every-day documents where things are often not so  
> complex (with very few overrides for examples).

Yes, that is a good idea. As for the structure of the WD, now it is like

definition - example; definition - example; ... and so on.

I would propose in addition a non-normative section like "examples" which  
contains these simple examples.

Hear you all in a minutes,

Felix
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 13:48:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC