W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org > November 2014

RE: ITS Module namespace

From: David Filip <davidf@davidf.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 01:54:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CANw5LKmuAR8kHQQFMM9HrnY0_+NhMz6YRgBQiTTB+1Tdheyxkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
Cc: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
I don't see a value in calling the namespace anything else than its. The
OASIS namespace is clearly a different namespace than the w3c one and
prefixes are anyway arbitrary..

dF is AFK, so please bear with the typos and call me at +353860222158 if my
answer seems insufficient..
 +1 for "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:xits:2.1" and "xits"


-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]
Sent: 07 November 2014 13:10
To: 'public-i18n-its-ig'
Subject: ITS Module namespace

Hi all,

Currently the 2.1 draft uses "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:its:2.1" for the ITS
module URI and "its" for the recommended prefix. We discussed a different
prefix to avoid confusion with the traditional "its" prefix.

Should we then use "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:xits:2.1" and "xits" in the
specification?

Deciding soon will help avoid having to fix unit tests and examples later.

Thanks,
-yves


------------------------------
VistaTEC Ltd. Registered in Ireland 268483.

Registered Office, VistaTEC House, 700, South Circular Road, Kilmainham.
Dublin 8. Ireland.

The information contained in this message, including any accompanying
documents, is confidential and is intended only for the addressee(s). The
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this message is
strictly forbidden. If you have received this message in error please
notify the sender immediately.
------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 9 November 2014 01:54:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:11:31 UTC