W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org > July 2014

Re: ITS2.0 ontology comment text

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 13:25:06 +0200
Cc: "dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie" <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org" <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BC5E0241-C395-4512-84BD-6FD0C47B203A@w3.org>
To: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Fine by me - Dave, what do you think?

- Felix

Am 04.07.2014 um 13:18 schrieb Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>:

> Hi Dave,
> I offered a while ago that the *sourcecode* of the ITS Ontology can be kept in the NLP2RDF Github repo https://github.com/NLP2RDF/ontologies/
> This is for development only. Staging can be done on W3C server.
> In short, the NLP2RDF repo provides the following infrastructure for ontologies:
> - source is edited in turtle
> - HTML docu is generated via script http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core/nif-core.html
> - different RDF serialisations are provided : Turtle, OWL, maybe JSON-LD in the future
> - Maven packages: https://github.com/NLP2RDF/software#java-maven-implementation-of-nif
> - Automatic Code generation based on the model
> - some validation
> Alternatively a GIT Submodule would be fine, as we are doing with NERD:
> https://github.com/NLP2RDF/ontologies/tree/master/vm
> All the best,
> Sebastian
> On 22.06.2014 12:52, dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie wrote:
>> Hi Guys, 
>> Attached is a short Word table where I've attempted to provide text for the attributes and two classes we identified in the ITS2.0 ontology. I took the the data category definitions (provided in the table for reference) and the text in the spec for each data attribute, and tried to provide a comment for each property that could be understood independently of definition of the overall data category. This is because the data categories themselves are not in the ontology, just that attributes. 
>> Also, I tried to use the convention of using the phrase 'annotated content' when referring the to text being annotated with the ITS attributes. That leaves the door open to the ontology being used in other ontological representations of content, in additional to NIF string, in the future. 
>> Any comments or suggestions welcome, use word revision marks if that makes sense, or I can put it up on the wiki also. 
>> We can discuss this at the next call and then use it to update the ITS 2.0 ontology. We also probably need some ontology specification level comment. I'd be interested to integrate this into a tutrle version of the ontology so we can move to a HTML specification, perhaps generated by a tool like LODE (http://www.essepuntato.it/lode). 
>> I'd also be interested to hear from Jirka and other if this per-attribute text might be useful for the ITS attributes web platform docs that Jirka started at http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/its/attributes a while back? 
>> Regards, 
>> Dave 
> -- 
> Sebastian Hellmann
> AKSW/NLP2RDF research group
> Insitute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) and DBpedia Association
> Events: 
> * Sept. 1-5, 2014 Conference Week in Leipzig, including 
> ** Sept 2nd, MLODE 2014 
> ** Sept 3rd, 2nd DBpedia Community Meeting
> ** Sept 4th-5th, SEMANTiCS (formerly i-SEMANTICS) 
> Venha para a Alemanha como PhD: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/csf
> Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://nlp2rdf.org, http://linguistics.okfn.org, https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt
> Homepage: http://aksw.org/SebastianHellmann
> Research Group: http://aksw.org
> Thesis:
> http://tinyurl.com/sh-thesis-summary
> http://tinyurl.com/sh-thesis
Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 11:25:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:11:31 UTC