W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org > July 2014

Re: ITS2.0 ontology comment text

From: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:18:12 +0200
Message-ID: <53B68D74.7070907@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
To: "dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie" <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org" <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Hi Dave,
I offered a while ago that the *sourcecode* of the ITS Ontology can be 
kept in the NLP2RDF Github repo https://github.com/NLP2RDF/ontologies/

This is for development only. Staging can be done on W3C server.

In short, the NLP2RDF repo provides the following infrastructure for 
- source is edited in turtle
- HTML docu is generated via script 
- different RDF serialisations are provided : Turtle, OWL, maybe JSON-LD 
in the future
- Maven packages: 
- Automatic Code generation based on the model
- some validation

Alternatively a GIT Submodule would be fine, as we are doing with NERD:

All the best,

On 22.06.2014 12:52, dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Attached is a short Word table where I've attempted to provide text 
> for the attributes and two classes we identified in the ITS2.0 
> ontology. I took the the data category definitions (provided in the 
> table for reference) and the text in the spec for each data attribute, 
> and tried to provide a comment for each property that could be 
> understood independently of definition of the overall data category. 
> This is because the data categories themselves are not in the 
> ontology, just that attributes.
> Also, I tried to use the convention of using the phrase 'annotated 
> content' when referring the to text being annotated with the ITS 
> attributes. That leaves the door open to the ontology being used in 
> other ontological representations of content, in additional to NIF 
> string, in the future.
> Any comments or suggestions welcome, use word revision marks if that 
> makes sense, or I can put it up on the wiki also.
> We can discuss this at the next call and then use it to update the ITS 
> 2.0 ontology. We also probably need some ontology specification level 
> comment. I'd be interested to integrate this into a tutrle version of 
> the ontology so we can move to a HTML specification, perhaps generated 
> by a tool like LODE (http://www.essepuntato.it/lode).
> I'd also be interested to hear from Jirka and other if this 
> per-attribute text might be useful for the ITS attributes web platform 
> docs that Jirka started at 
> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/its/attributes a while back?
> Regards,
> Dave

Sebastian Hellmann
AKSW/NLP2RDF research group
Insitute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) and DBpedia Association
* *Sept. 1-5, 2014* Conference Week in Leipzig, including
** *Sept 2nd*, MLODE 2014
** *Sept 3rd*, 2nd DBpedia Community Meeting
** *Sept 4th-5th*, SEMANTiCS (formerly i-SEMANTICS) <http://semantics.cc/>
Venha para a Alemanha como PhD: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/csf
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://nlp2rdf.org, 
http://linguistics.okfn.org, https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt 
Homepage: http://aksw.org/SebastianHellmann
Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 11:18:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:11:31 UTC