- From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:44:26 +0100
- To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
On 30/08/2013 12:54, Yves Savourel wrote: >> - general: in some place one may want to remind readers of >> >the HTML <> XML conversion its-annotators-ref <> its:annotatorsRef > Not sure about that one. > We don't use its-annotators-ref in XLIFF, so is there a reason why we would refer to it (other than in an example where the original > document is in HTML)? > And then why make a special mention of its-annotators-ref vs its:annotatorsRef but not the other mappings between the HTML and the > XML notations (like its-ta-class-ref vs its:taClassRef in the same example). > I'm probably missing something. > > +1 - we already mention its:annotatorsRef where its used with the relevant data categories, i.e. term, textAnalysis and mtconfidence - so i'm not sure it need special mention beyond that. cheers, Dave
Received on Monday, 2 September 2013 08:42:02 UTC