Re: I18N-ACTION-507: Double check handling of note status for unicode-xml while we work on it

On 19/04/2016 16:51, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> I wrote WD but meant ED. I know we're not going to publish the EDs as WD to TR (too many acronyms?). My point was: why not just put the warning box into a copy of the ReSpec version we have, generate as Note, and publish that to TR, remove the warning, and move along with writing the new version?

exactly. I thought that was my original suggestion.  Sorry if i mangled 
it. ;-)

sounds like we have a plan then.

i'll work on it, maybe tomorrow.

ri

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 16:09:33 UTC