- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 17:51:52 +0100
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Thanks Addison. I've been reading the doc and I have one more request. We're supposed to spell-check the draft before publication - I found lots of typos that would be eliminated by a spell-check review. Could you run one? Doing this now will avoid people raising lots of editorial comments, and us running the fixes down to ground and communicating about them later. RI On 07/07/2014 17:39, Phillips, Addison wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I have corrected the ED (I forgot that I fixed the HMTL markup error when generating the WD) in the course of generating the updated documents. > > I also fixed the actual broken links in the source (two of which should have shown up before: go figure). > > The "undefined" link errors are all generated by ReSpec :-(. The source doc doesn't have any. These appear to be the links generated on the requirements. It looks as though the requirements should be generating autonumbered anchors and instead it generated "#undefined" fragment links. There is no documentation immediately apparent in ReSpec. > > Temporarily, I have replaced the div=req with div=requirement and supplied local styling (including a counter). > > Source: http://www.inter-locale.com/w3c/charmod-norm-20-draft-20140707.html > > WD: http://www.inter-locale.com/w3c/Overview(17).html > ED: http://www.inter-locale.com/w3c/Overview(18).html > > Addison
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 16:52:21 UTC