public-i18n-core@w3.org from January to March 2012 by author

Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin

• Re: Rework of Bidi inline article (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: I18N-ISSUE-123: Insertion of U+202C [HTML5-prep] (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Rework of Bidi inline article (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Rework of Bidi inline article (Tuesday, 7 February)

Alissa Cooper

• Fwd: Geolocation API Level 2 LC comment (Wednesday, 11 January)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 16589] Can't upload spec section data for XML (Saturday, 31 March)
• [Bug 16590] New: View results broken for certain i18n-XML tests (Saturday, 31 March)
• [Bug 16589] New: Can't upload spec section data for XML (Saturday, 31 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• [Bug 16190] Polyglot Markup: Clarify that xml:lang is optional (Sunday, 25 March)
• [Bug 16190] Polyglot Markup: Clarify that xml:lang is optional (Friday, 23 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Friday, 23 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Saturday, 3 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Friday, 2 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Friday, 2 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16167] i18n-ISSUE-141: Mistake in entity assignments (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16167] i18n-ISSUE-141: Mistake in entity assignments (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16167] New: i18n-ISSUE-141: Mistake in entity assignments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16166] New: i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16165] i18n-ISSUE-136: Recognition of number formats in Number state (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Thursday, 9 February)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Thursday, 9 February)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Tuesday, 7 February)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Tuesday, 7 February)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Tuesday, 7 February)
• [Bug 10829] Remove the whitespace from the <rp> example (Tuesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 10829] Remove the whitespace from the <rp> example (Tuesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Friday, 27 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Friday, 27 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Friday, 27 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Thursday, 26 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Thursday, 26 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Thursday, 26 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Wednesday, 18 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Wednesday, 18 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Wednesday, 18 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Wednesday, 18 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Wednesday, 18 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Wednesday, 18 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Tuesday, 17 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Monday, 16 January)
• [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content (Friday, 13 January)
• [Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb (Thursday, 5 January)

fantasai

• [CSS] Deferring rtl/ltr annotations to L4 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: i18n-ISSUE-140: Multilingual q nesting [CSS21] [css3-content] (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Sunday, 12 February)
• [css3-background] should box-decoration-break also apply to bidi reordering splits? (Wednesday, 11 January)

Internationalization Core Working Group Issue Tracker

• I18N-ISSUE-155: [Bug 16520] New: Don't indicate that XML MIME types *requires* xml:lang [Adhoc-HTML] (Monday, 26 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-154: [Polyglot] "Clarify that xml:lang is optional" [Mail-HTML] (Friday, 23 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-153: Why aren't ASCII and latin1 encodings in the label list? [Encoding-prep] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-152: New content and formats must exclusively use the utf-8 encoding [Encoding-prep] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-151: This algorithm is different from the one defined in section 1.4 of Unicode Technical Standard #22 [Encoding-prep] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-150: User agents must not support any other encodings or labels. [Encoding-prep] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-149: Code point definition [Encoding-prep] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-148: Code-point length shouldn't be number of code units [HTML5-prep] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• I18N-ISSUE-147: [css3-syntax] CSS escape sequences [CSS-mail] (Friday, 20 January)

John O'Conner

• Re: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Friday, 17 February)
• Request to invite non-members to w3c i18n wg mtg (Thursday, 16 February)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) (Saturday, 10 March)

Larry Masinter

• RE: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Thursday, 16 February)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Thursday, 9 February)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: I18N-ISSUE-149: Code point definition [Encoding-prep] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Encoding specification (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: [minutes] i18n telecon 2012-02-22 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Friday, 17 February)

Mathias Bynens

• Re: non-support of using surrogate pairs in CSS escapes [I18N-ACTION-90] [I18N-ISSUE-147] (Wednesday, 1 February)

Norbert Lindenberg

• Re: HTML5 Comment disposition (Wednesday, 21 March)

Paul Cotton

• RE: ISSUE-172: restore-rb- Chairs Solicit Proposals (Friday, 13 January)

Paul Hoffman

• Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) (Saturday, 10 March)

Phillips, Addison

• [Unicode liaison] Encoding document at W3C (Monday, 26 March)
• FW: TransAnn: LCWD of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline April 3 (Tuesday, 13 March)
• HTML5 Comment disposition (Friday, 2 March)
• FW: IRI working group progress -- new drafts (Friday, 2 March)
• RE: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Wednesday, 22 February)
• FW: New full Unicode for ES6 idea (Sunday, 19 February)
• Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Thursday, 16 February)
• RE: Request to invite non-members to w3c i18n wg mtg (Thursday, 16 February)
• IME API work... (Saturday, 11 February)
• UTR#50 [I18N-ACTION-93] (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: Selecting Glyph Variants (Wednesday, 1 February)
• non-support of using surrogate pairs in CSS escapes [I18N-ACTION-90] [I18N-ISSUE-147] (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: Selecting Glyph Variants (Tuesday, 31 January)
• RE: ISSUE-172: restore-rb- Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 12 January)
• FW: ISSUE-172: restore-rb- Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 12 January)

Richard Ishida

• Re: I18N-ISSUE-149: Code point definition [Encoding-prep] (Friday, 23 March)
• [minutes] i18n telecon 2012-03-21 (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Encoding specification (Tuesday, 13 March)
• [minutes] i18n telecon 2012-03-07 (Monday, 12 March)
• i18n-ISSUE-140: Multilingual q nesting (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [minutes] i18n telecon, 2012-02-29 (Wednesday, 29 February)
• New issue products (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Rework of Bidi inline article (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [minutes] i18n telecon 2012-02-22 (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG (Friday, 17 February)
• i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Thursday, 9 February)
• New products for tracker review (Wednesday, 8 February)
• [minutes] i18n core telecon 2012-02-08 (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Rework of Bidi inline article (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Rework of Bidi inline article (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Rework of Bidi inline article (Thursday, 2 February)
• [minutes] i18n telecon 2012-02-01 (Wednesday, 1 February)
• [minutes] i18n telecon 2012-01-25 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: FW: ISSUE-172: restore-rb- Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 12 January)

Sam Ruby

• Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Tuesday, 14 February)

Swaran Lata

• Fwd: Re: Lists tests (Monday, 2 January)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: non-support of using surrogate pairs in CSS escapes [I18N-ACTION-90] [I18N-ISSUE-147] (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: [css3-background] should box-decoration-break also apply to bidi reordering splits? (Wednesday, 11 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2012 19:03:34 UTC