- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 02:01:47 -0500
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "ML public-i18n-core (public-i18n-core@w3.org)" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
The question came up during the test case development/review[1] for text-transform:fullwidth[2]. Unicode defines U+3000 IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE is the full-width counterpart of U+0020 SPACE, so I guess it should be done. The primary use case for the property value is to typeset Latin characters and digits like ideographic characters as written in the spec, so transforming U+0020 to U+3000 makes sense to me given the use case. But U+0020 is a little special in HTML/CSS and therefore I'd like to confirm if doing so doesn't harm anything badly. Any opinions appreciated. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2011Feb/0072.html [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-transform Regards, Koji
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 07:02:41 UTC