Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Per the grammar you should be able to get a non-normalized tree and > should not suddenly end up with, say, a tree normalized to NFC. It does > not explicitly forbid it, but it does not forbid throwing a non > namespace well-formedness error on Sundays either. OK. So in other words a parser that normalizes as it goes would not technically be XML 1.0 compliant, yes? -BorisReceived on Monday, 2 February 2009 14:52:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 February 2009 14:52:22 GMT