W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: possible issue with LEIRI definition in draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt

From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:48:07 -0400
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-iri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080730014807.GH15202@mercury.ccil.org> 

Martin Duerst scripsit:

> It may be that indeed all or most of your specs want to reference
> LEIRIs. In that case (especially if it's all), it might be approriate
> to rewrite section 7 of the current draft to concentrate on LEIRI
> references (maybe as far as changing the title to Legacy Extended IRI
> References). In particular if it's all your specs, the rewrite should
> be straightforward. Please advise.

Reading "LEIRI references" for "LEIRIs" in the first sentence, then yes,
I believe we care only about LEIRI references and not at all about LEIRIs.

-- 
John Cowan  http://ccil.org/~cowan  cowan@ccil.org
All "isms" should be "wasms".   --Abbie
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 01:48:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:56 GMT