Re: Feedback: qa-utf8-bom.en.php *1* [Comments]

Hi Richard,

two minor comments:

- the question is talking about user agents, whereas the sections 
"Detecting the BOM" and below is talking mainly about editors. You might 
want to unify that (or maybe I miss the reason why there is a difference 
necessary?).

- "(With the Latin 1 (ISO 8859-1) character encoding, the signature 
displays as characters .)": Not sure if this is the case only for ISO 
8859-1. I seem to have the same effect for at least US-ASCII. So maybe
"(With for example the Latin 1 (ISO 8859-1) character encoding, the 
signature displays as characters .)"

Felix

Richard Ishida wrote:
> Folks,
>
> When I considered adding some text to address this comment, I found myself
> wanting (once again) to edit the article in question
> (http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-bom) to make it clearer.
> I gave in to my urges and came up with this:
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/temp.php
>
> I think this has a clearer structure.  Note that I also added links to a
> couple of personal pages I wrote to provide suggested solutions.
>
> Do you think we should go with this new version?
>
> RI
>
>
>
>
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> Internationalization Lead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
>  
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
>  
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Sent: 14 June 2007 08:32
>> To: member-geo-feedback@w3.org
>> Subject: Feedback: qa-utf8-bom.en.php *1* [Comments]
>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-bom.en.php
>> Usefulness: 1/5 
>> Described as:   Designer   
>>
>> Comments:
>> It\'s been very educational the only thing is: it doesn\'t 
>> answer the question \"how to remove this signature from the 
>> file\". Some examples for Dreamweaver and other popular 
>> editors will be helpful.  
>>
>>     
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 15:58:39 UTC