Personally, I disagree with dropping early normalization. The perceived problems with early normalization come from a desire to be absolutely perfect, which is just too idealistic. I have started a more detailled mail, but not completed it yet. I hope to complete it e.g. over the next weekend. Regards, Martin. At 00:07 06/10/04, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >Hello Michael, > >This was on the agenda of todays i18n core call, but unfortunatley >Francois was ill and couldn't make it, so we postponed it until next week. > >We discussed the issue at >http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-i18ncore-minutes.html#item04: >[[ >Richard: we have enough on the battle of early normalization >Francois: yes >... I sad it was a good idea >... we cannot have early Unicode normalization, so it is better to have this >... I send my reply to Michael also to the list and wait a week]] > >Francois drafted a personal reply to you which is at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0172.html >. >Personally I think it is very likely that the group will aprove Francois' >proposal, but of course I can't promise. > >Felix > >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> just a quick nudge. Did you ever find time to discuss the issue >> described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/ >> 2006JulSep/0134.html >> and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/ >> 0172.html >> -- namely the issue raised against XML Schema 1.1 at >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3245 >> ? >> >> If so, the rest of the XML Schema Working Group and I would be glad to >> hear your thoughts. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Michael Sperberg-McQueen >> >> >> #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jpReceived on Thursday, 5 October 2006 06:27:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:51 GMT