W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > July to September 2006

RE: Remarks on i18n core comments on ITS

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:54:23 +0100
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007c01c6a4c7$9b6e92c0$6401a8c0@w3cishida>

Most comments went into the table at 

Those that didn't can be seen below.

Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
> First a clarification question: Will there be more places of 
> comments than
> A) 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jul/0000.html
> B) 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jul/0001.html
> C) 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0008.html
> D)
> http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> ? D) Contains editorial comments and substantive ones, and I 
> think it would be good to get *all* further comments only as 
> an addition to D), to make tracking easier.

A-C contain numerous small editorial suggestions. I'm not expecting major
discussions to result from them, they are mostly for consideration by the
ITS editor.  I don't expect the ITS group to track each one of these
suggestions individually through the formal comment review tracking

D, on the other hand, contains more important editorial comments, that may
need discussion within the group, or that I'd particularly like to see, plus
some more substantive comments.  I do expect the ITS group to respond to
these one by one.

> Comment 17, 18, 19, 20: These comments are on sec. 6.3.2, but 
> the review table says "6.2.3".

Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 08:54:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:23:01 UTC