Re: I18n comment: en-cockney

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
>
> I cannot see that this change accomplishes anything. RFC 3066 says "- 
> Dialect or variant information, such as en-scouse" where the phrase 
> "such as" is clearly essential. The use of "en-scouse" as an example in 
> no way precludes the possibility of "en-cockney" being an equally valid 
> production.

Except that en-scouse is registered and valid, and en-cockney is not.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 18:34:24 UTC