W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Ruby: questions about fallback

From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 01:15:30 -0500
To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, "KOBAYASHI Tatsuo(FAMILY Given)" <tlk@kobysh.com>, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Message-ID: <20130307061530.GR28503@mercury.ccil.org>
Richard Ishida scripsit:

> But the question is, do they need to be rubified as compounds or as
> individual characters?  My guess is the latter.

The only thing I know about is hanzi followed by Pinyin readings.  Usually
this is done at the level of whole phrases or sentences.  I doubt if anyone
marks this up as ruby, though.

Unless it was by accident that I had            John Cowan
offended someone, I never apologized.           cowan@ccil.org
        --Quentin Crisp                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 06:15:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:10:24 UTC