W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Draft new ruby markup for HTML extension (ed comments)

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:45:53 +0000
Message-ID: <51262511.60404@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
CC: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org
Try this:

法•ほ•華•け•経•きょう

ho•ke•kyou  (sutra)

See the attached screen grab for distribution.

RI


On 20/02/2013 16:34, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> [2] Jukugo ruby
>>
>> "The distinction is captured in this example: "
>>
>> Actually the example doesn't quite capture it - the illustration makes
>> jukugo ruby look like group ruby. It isn't. See the examples at the
>> bottom of http://rishida.net/blog/?p=469 and you'll notice that gaps
>> open up in some cases, because jukugo styling is basically just a
>> special kind of ruby overhang where one character (and not more) can
>> overhang an adjacent base character if it doesn't fit on its own base
>> character.  Nor does jukugo styling prevent breakup of the underlying
>> base characters.
>
> I understand that that's an issue but I am not the best person to
> produce a new example (as you saw when last I did). Could you provide a
> better example?


-- 
Richard Ishida
W3C
http://rishida.net/


Screen_shot_2013-02-21_at_13.45.14.png
(image/png attachment: Screen_shot_2013-02-21_at_13.45.14.png)

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 13:46:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 February 2013 13:46:27 GMT