W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [css3-fonts] Synthesizing oblique, to which direction in RTL and vertical flow?

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:03:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+ennww-nX6jDZEb+o2+V0BRWFHON46=HtQAm3X+bsPD6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
Cc: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "'WWW International' (www-international@w3.org)" <www-international@w3.org>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:56 AM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote:

> On 03/02/13 10:57 PM, Ambrose LI wrote:
>
>  I might be wrong but I believe this is language dependent. AFAIK in
>> Hebrew the slant would be to the right (i.e., same as LTR scripts);
>> but Arabic and Persian slant to the opposite direction, to the left.
>>
>
> There are variable practices for Hebrew, and the Masterfont foundry in
> Israel even ships some font families with two sets of 'italics', one
> leaning right and one leaning left. Personally, I've generally favoured a
> lean to the right, because it produces a more visually compact style with
> stronger forms (when leaning to the left, the letters dalet and resh become
> attenuated), and because of the precedence of some mediaeval manuscript
> styles that lean to the right.


It sounds like it may be useful to define a font descriptor in @font-family
that allows the user to provide guidance to the UA about which direction
slant should apply when synthesizing oblique.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 18:04:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 February 2013 18:04:25 GMT