Since there seems to be considerable disagreement re dir=uba, maybe that can be removed from the current draft proposal and reconsidered separately later? behdad On 09/02/10 23:31, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:14 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Also, I should mention, it might make sense for dir=uba to be restricted >> to <pre> and <textarea> elements (where it would do per-paragraph) and >> to inline elements (where it would be the same as first-strong). > > If dir=uba is going to have the same meaning as first-strong for > inline elements, then why should it be allowed on those elements at > all? > > -- > Ehsan > <http://ehsanakhgari.org/> >Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 03:34:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 3 September 2010 03:34:04 GMT