- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 20:56:09 +0200
- To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>, Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
> With "How > important is RDF", I don't mean "I want to remove RDF". Alright, so then we're not assessing the importance of RDF > just because something is possible > to express in RDF should not make its serialization in JSON > unimportant. Sure, but then the subject of this thread should be "how important is the convenience of the JSON-LD serialization". And I don't think anybody disagrees it is important. It does mean we can pay some extra attention to the development of the JSON-LD context. But this is orthogonal to the design of the Hydra Core Vocabulary. > JSON-LD > acknowledges the fact that syntax is important and it should be made > understandable regardless of the fact that it expresses RDF graphs and > regardless of whether the consumer of the syntax has heard of RDF > before or not. Of course. Ruben
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 18:56:42 UTC