Re: Relation between Hydra classes and RDF classes from Ryan Shaw on 2015-11-11 (public-hydra@w3.org from November 2015)

From: Ryan Shaw <ryanshaw@unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:21:19 -0500
To: Miguel <miguel.ceriani@gmail.com>
CC: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAEvLMeT7Ve2nf0Nn+e+Qx_USSLV4MVDqKaOAwatApRFw1p=Lrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Miguel <miguel.ceriani@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO you could also define your ex:vocab#ConceptScheme as hydra:Class AND as
> subclass of skos:ConceptScheme.
> That way you are saying that the instances of your class
> ex:vocab#ConceptScheme are instances of skos:ConceptScheme class AND support
> a specific set of Hydra operations.
>
> Does it make sense?

Yes, this makes sense and would seem to avoid the problems that could
arise if my representations referred to other skos:ConceptSchemes,
outside of my control, which might not be dereferenceable.

Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 21:21:56 UTC