W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Enumeration values

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:14:23 +0100
Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
Message-Id: <12A8635F-FE89-4E0B-8293-7C5FE9BD5CAB@ugent.be>
To: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
>> OWL does it. I understand most people don't want to go that
>> “complex” (even though it's quite alright), but we should just be
>> aware that a modeling-based solution also exists.
> 
> And it would have the beauty that it is already available and the
> concepts are known, at least by modelers. I would certainly prefer
> that over defining new hydra properties.
> 
> What do you have in mind, maybe owl:Restriction?

owl:oneOf seems to be the best candidate:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-ref-20021112/#oneOf-def

Best,

Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2015 12:14:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:44 UTC