Re: remove hydra:Resource and hydra:Class

• From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
• Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 08:28:00 +1000
• To: public-hydra@w3.org
• Message-ID: <54AB0FF0.1020001@topquadrant.com>

On 1/5/2015 21:58, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
> The only difference between hydra:Resource and rdfs:Resource
> is that hydra:Resource instances are dereferenceable;
> and rdfs:Resource itself adds no semantics whatsoever, since
> “all things described by RDF are instances of the class rdfs:Resource” [1].

Just checking: is everybody aware that according to the official RDF 
spec, rdfs:Resource includes literal nodes? This may be another 
difference between hydra:Resource and rdfs:Resource.

(I am not defending the official spec here, neither would I argue that 
this is a reason to keep hydra:Resource).

Holger

Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 22:31:16 UTC