W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Do we want to capitalize datatypes such as hydra:rfc6570Template? (ISSUE-17)

From: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:14:36 +0100 (CET)
To: 'Hydra' <public-hydra@w3.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <517523310.2839052.1420492476765.open-xchange@oxweb01.eigbox.net>
Hi Markus,

Looking at the XML Schema built-in datatypes [1] there are a few exceptions to
the initial lowercase rule like xsd:NMTOKEN, xsd:Name and xsd:NCName.
No strong preference from me, but whatever is decided *should* be applied

Would say hydra:RFC6570Template is also a viable option in this case.

One comment is that the Schema.org datatypes are all classes and following
'normal' naming conventions applied there have initial caps.
Side note is as I read it are all of these stated to be a subclass of the
schema:Datatype class, which would imply the value "true" has type
schema:Datatype which seems a bit strange, would  make more sense to me for
schema:Datatype to be a class of datatypes (i.e. schema:Boolean is a

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#xsd-datatypes


John Walker
Principal Consultant & co-founder
Semaku B.V.
SFJ 4.009, Torenallee 20, 5617 BC Eindhoven
Mobile: +31 6 475 22030
Email: john.walker@semaku.com
Skype: jaw111

KvK: 58031405
BTW: NL852842156B01
IBAN: NL94 INGB 0008 3219 95

> On January 5, 2015 at 9:43 PM Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> I think we actually never discussed the capitalization of datatypes such as
> hydra:rfc6570Template. Should we keep it in lowercase or capitalize it as we
> do with classes, i.e., call it hydra:Rfc6570Template? *Most* XSD datatypes are
> lowercase, Schema.org's are all uppercase as are rdf:HTML and rdf:XMLLiteral.
> Thoughts? Preferences?
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 21:15:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:44 UTC