W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > January 2015

Naming style: camelCase or not? Plural or not? (#81)

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 08:57:09 +0100
To: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6C3C7386-2E6B-40E6-9B74-4E550D4E75B8@ugent.be>
The following mail was posted on the GitHub issue tracker:

> From: Kévin Dunglas
> Subject: [Specifications] Naming style: camelCase or not? Plural or not? (#81)
> Date: 5 Jan 2015 08:53:47 GMT+1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working on implementing a JSON-LD+Hydra API. Some property's names follow the camelCase style and some other are all in lowercase.
> 
> Ex:
> 
> 	• entrypoint / readonly / writeonly (all in small caps)
> 	• statusCodes / supportedProperty / supportedOperation
> A similar naming inconsistency appends with the plural form:
> 
> 	• supportedClass / supportedOperation (singular)
> 	• statusCodes (plural)
> Is it intended?
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 07:57:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:44 UTC